sql server - Understanding varchar (max) 8000 column and why I …
May 18, 2017 · If n is set to max and the data type is nvarchar, SQL Server returns up to 2^31-1 bytes, which the .Net datareader can interpret to be up to (2^31-1)/2 characters. If n is set to …
What are the current best practices concerning varchar sizing in …
Jun 28, 2018 · SQL Server will physically limit you to just over 8000 bytes. Using LOB types — VARCHAR(MAX), NVARCHAR(MAX), VARBINARY(MAX), XML, and the deprecated TEXT, …
sql server - Error converting VARCHAR (MAX) to XML due to "UTF …
Oct 26, 2020 · I need to dig into a logs table with a schema similar to this: CREATE TABLE t ( id int PRIMARY KEY, data varchar(max) ); Column data stores a XML text received from a web …
sql server - Should I used varchar (max) or varchar (4000) SPARSE ...
Jan 29, 2015 · comments varchar(max) NULL -- this is the current column definition comments varchar(4000) SPARSE NULL My current understanding is that in both cases, a NULL value …
sql server - Index on VARCHAR (MAX) column - Database …
Oct 15, 2021 · The limits are 16 columns and 900 bytes for versions before SQL Database and SQL Server 2016 (13.x). Columns that are of the large object (LOB) data types ntext, text, …
sql server - Converting a VARCHAR to VARBINARY - Database ...
0x9473FBCCBC01AFE and CONVERT to BINARY gives a completely different value 0x3078393437334642434342433031414645 I tried changing the value definition in the …
t sql - varchar (MAX) text cuts off while going more than 8000 ...
It's SQL server trying to be storage-efficient by deciding that your varchar (max) is really a varchar (8000). Credit where due, I found this article that explained the behavior I was seeing when I …
Are the limits of varchar(8000) and nvarchar(4000) because of the …
Feb 21, 2022 · Yes. In SQL Server version 7 the 8K page was introduced and varchar (n) max length went from 255 to 8000. The page size before version 7 was 2K, so allowing a varchar to …
sql server - What's the difference between varchar (255) and …
If the values of a column are only going to be <= 255 characters, is there any real difference between using varchar (255) and varchar (max). I realize that varchar(255) has a limit of 255 …
sql server - Alternative way to compress NVARCHAR (MAX)?
@wBob Even if the largest value was only 2000 characters, wouldn't converting to VARCHAR potentially cause data loss if characters from more than 1 Code Page are being used? I would …